The Fox News Joe Muto and Soupy Sales Show

The latest on  Fox News and former employee Joe Muto.   If you havent heard the scuttlebutt it seems that Joe Muto published comments etc: on the sly as an employee of Fox News.  I use the words “seems” and “news” lightly.

Joe Muto - by "Gawker.com"

After Muto’s identity became known  he was on the payroll of the Web Site Gawker.  I had never heard of Gawker and so I was curious.

It didn’t take me long to realize that Muto’s new employer’s work product is strangely similar to the product produced by Fox News.  It sort of makes sense since Muto was an assistant producer to the Bill O Riley show.

It’s a little suspect though  isn’t it?

Anyway after my 2-4 minutes of looking at the site I logged on and made this comment to Mr. Muto.  Thought you all would find the comment interesting or even entertaining. The real scary thing about all this is that when you read the other comments its clear  how serious these people take all this.  We are in serious trouble.

Soupy Sales

Comment to Mr. Joe Muto

I find this whole thing interesting enough to give it about 5 seconds attention.  It sounds like Mr. Muto is an intelligent person, college educated and all, but everyone knows that Fox News, NBC, MSN, CBS and others are not really serious sources of news or the truth.” 

 ”Fox News is probably the very last place one would consider a source of News or the truth.  Fox is on the level of the Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity or Soupy Sales show.” 

“ Mr. Muto did you really, really, think you were working for CSpan?”

“God help those that live, vote and die by what Rush, Sean, Soupy and Bill regurgitate.”

Hey Gawker HR.   How much do you pay?

Protect Your children

 

Is Obama Care A Tax Or a Fee

Obama Care, a Tax or a Fee?  This is a two-sided sword. How many states and especially cities charge us all a fee for this or that claiming that they can do this because it’s not a tax. Taxes require some kind of legislative or voter approval. But fees are levied on us with the stroke of a pen. You all know what kind of fees I’m talking about. Fees that we all know are really taxes.  California uses this to supplement their budget.

If the Supreme Court rules that Obama care is actually a tax I suspect there will be lawsuits against States and Cities to recover billions of illegally collected fees.  If the Court rules it is not a tax, Obama Care wins and the States win but we lose.  I think we all know which way this is going to end up.

 

 

Protect your children

 

 

My Trip To The Social Security Office

How to opt out of Social Security Medicare Part B

If you are like me you have listened to what politicians say about  “Obama Care”  which I believe refers to the  new version of Medicare, and formed some sort of opinion about it.  And again if you are like me you really didn’t learn any more about Medicare after hearing what the pundits said  than you did before they opened their mouth..

Unless you have had an experience that required actual interaction with the Medicare system we probably just picked our favorite politicians viewpoint and left it at that.

The simple idea that everyone in this country should have medical assistance and treatment whether it is an emergency or illness is an attractive one. The idea that it is provided by our government (Social Medicine) may be attractive or not depending on your political religion.  The point of this article is that we have it whether we like it or not, now what?

Now What?  I am a veteran and have been receiving VA medical benefits for years.  Unlike some, I have always appreciated the treatment I have received at VA hospitals. I have been treated in Denver, Portland, Phoenix and now San Diego and have had major surgeries.  That said, I have not been interested much in “Obama Care”.  That is until I recently received a letter in the mail from the people at Social Security .  The letter said  my Social Security check was going to be reduced approximately $100.00 because I had automatically been enrolled in Medicare. My 65th birthday was a month away.    “Medicare?”  I thought. “ I don’t need no Medicare.”

Medicare

I had heard from a pundit, or possibly while having a glass of my favorite beverage at my favorite pub that we had certain options available to us. I thought that one of these options was that veterans who benefit from receiving health care from the VA do not need to be included in the new “Obama Care”.

I had previously received a SS Medicare booklet. I dragged it out of a pile of stuff on my desk and read it. I read about the basic Medicare and how it is now included with your social security at no charge, I read about Medicare B, C, and D and how they can be purchased but there was nothing in there about the VA except that Veterans had a choice when care is needed. A veteran can choose to be treated at a Medicare certified facility or the VA but not both. There was nothing about Veterans opting out of Medicare B.

I went to the on line Veterans web site. There was nothing about veterans opting out.  I went to the Social Security site. Nothing there either about Veterans opting out of Medicare part B.  “ Maybe I was wrong” I thought. “But why would Veterans be forced to pay for a service he/she is not going to use?”  I kept looking. I looked at the Social Security “forms” page to see if the “opt out” form was there. No luck.

Finally on a blogging site about 6 Google pages back I found what I was looking for. A fellow blogger and Veteran said on his blog that if you’re a vet and you do not want to pay for Social Security Medicare part B you can sign the back of your new Medicare  Card and send it back to Social Security.  “Great” I said to myself. “But I have not received a Medicare Card and they are going to start reducing my benefits in a few weeks.”  “I  know.” I thought. I’ll write a letter”.   I did just that. I wrote a letter to the Social Security office in California stating that I did not want to be included in the Medicare Part B or C or any of it that was not included at no cost in my basic benefit.

A few days later I received a voice message from a lady at the SS office. She said that I would be required to go to the nearest SS office and personally sign the “opt out” form and that it could not be done on line. “At least I had the solution.” I thought.

The next day I made the75 mile drive from Ensenada Mexico to San Diego. As I walked into the Social Security entry room I could see the room had about 6 windows with a person sitting at a desk facing out at each window.

There were 4 or 5 people standing in line at the first window and I thought.”This must be the starting line.” When it was my turn I told the young lady facing me at the first window that I wanted to opt out of Medicare Part B. She told me to have a seat and my name would be called. My name was eventually called and instructed me to go to window 5.

As I stood in front of the bulletproof glass that separated me from the female on the other side of window 5 I wondered if maybe some of the people who came into this building thought they were in a bank.  Or maybe the people on the other side of the glass thought the Social Security Office was a bank and were afraid of being robbed. I noted that there was an armed guard standing near the entry door. “Extra protection from the evil retired bank robbers in the room ” I thought.

The separation glass at window 5 was dirty and someone had scratched the F word on it. The woman on the other side had a sandwich on her desk and as she wiped her mouth her eyes raised up from a form lying in front of her. Her eyes slowly  met mine.  As she squinted at me I heard her raspy voice say “Everyone one must pay for Medicare”

“But” I said, “I already have socialized medical care provided by the VA. Why would I need another?”

She looked back down at her desk and asked, “Did you ask the VA about this?”  “Yes” I said. “And what did they tell you?” she asked.

“They told me last week that I had better coverage now than I would have if I used Medicare”

The woman slowly stood up from her chair. She leaned over her desk and looked at me. Her breathing was fogging the bulletproof glass.

“Are you telling me that someone at the VA told you to opt out of Medicare part B?”

I stepped back. “Should I rat out the VA?” I asked myself. “They might get angry and seek revenge.”

“Maybe the VA is the reason for the bulletproof glass.” I thought.

“Yea, that’s what they said”  I told her. I couldn’t prevent a smirk.

“Did they tell you there was a 10% penalty for opting out?”

“What Penalty?” I asked. “I’m not even 65 yet.”

“You will be penalized 10 percent of the cost of Medicare if you opt out”

“But I haven’t joined yet. Are you telling there is a penalty for not joining Medicare? I didn’t ask for it. Ten percent of what?”

I sensed that the conversation was becoming adversarial. The security guard could sense it too.  He was now standing behind me hand on his gun.

The woman sat down.  Now that she had security I could see that she did not feel threatened by me or the VA. She pushed a form to me under the bulletproof glass. “You will need to sign this. She said. It states that you acknowledge that we have informed you that if you opt out of Medicare part B and then  at a later date you want to enroll in Medicare Part B you will be assessed a 10% penalty.”

I heard the security guard mumble, “You have a problem with that?”

I signed the paper. I wanted to deal with the VA where there is no bulletproof glass.

As I walked out of the building I had a sense of triumph. I had done it. I had actually opted out of Medicare Part B without getting shot. I turned and looked back at the woman at window 5. There was another person standing there. An older woman with a walker was pointing her finger at the bulletproof glass and talking loudly. The security guard was standing behind her hand on gun. I wondered if the woman was trying to opt out of Medicare Part B.

I knew she didn’t have a chance. She didn’t have back up. The VA.

The Federal Reserve Authorized a Money Laundering Bank

Sign Petition

Linda of Garland, TX on Feb. 10, 2012
Satisfaction Rating: 1/5

I checked my account online on a Friday morning and noticed that I had a -.01 balance available, but a $236.00 posted balance. I went and deposited $40.00 cash in the ATM at 4 pm to make sure everything would be okay after my deposit. I was expecting my balance to be $39.99 in the positive. To my surprise, my balance was only $1.99 in the positive. I checked balance once again online and there showed to be a $38.00 NSF fee on my account.

I asked the man who answered the phone at the branch that I show a $1.99 available balance and had not used my card at all that day. I wanted to be sure I would accrue no more charges, his reply was that I should be fine and to call back the next day. I called back the next day and was told no one was at the branch that could help me. Monday morning, 3 more $38.00 charges, Tuesday morning 5 more NSF charges, I now have no more transactions pending and everything is paid, current balance -307.00 of which $304 are all NSF fees.

Article

BBVA Bank a bank with a history of money laundering has been  authorized to do business in the United States with the sponsorship of Wells Fargo Bank and the approval of the Federal Reserve.

This is a story of governmental actions or inactions that now have compelling consequences for the American people.  It’s a story that has gone un-noticed until now largely because we are constantly reminded how our government is preventing our banking industry from repeating activities that fueled our present financial  situation.  The powers to be would have us believe that they have banking matters of concern in hand.

It may be correct that our government has collared the obvious participants and held the most culpable of them accountable for their deeds but the illegal pilfering has not stopped.  In fact the trail of this story leads to political positions on high.

This is a story that does not prompt the question  “ How did these things happen?”  The how is obvious.  We can  assume this story is about corruption in our government.

BBVA stands for Banco Bilbao Vizcaya and Argentaria.

Wickipedia says:

Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria ( BBVA ) is a bank Spanish  with interests in financial institutions in over thirty countries.

It has about 107,000 employees, about 47 million customers worldwide and about 1 million shareholders.

Before the name BBVA they were BBV (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya). In 1999 BBV merged with its rival, Argentaria (an Argentinean Bank) amid an international money laundering scandal involving the CIA and the IRS.

Argentaria’s Chariman was Emillio Ybarra and the Co-Chariman was Francisco Rodriguez Gonzalez.

The new bank now known as BBVA was initially co-chaired by Argentaria’s chairman Emilio Ybarra and Francisco Gonzalez.  Ybarra resigned and now Gonzalez rules BBVA  himself.

The money laundering scandal investigation was launched in 2000 by the United States and in Spain .

The Financial Times’s Leslie Crawford reports:

In July 2002, it was reported that the US Department of Justice is investigating alleged money laundering by BBVA, Spain’s second largest bank.

US attorneys have arrived in Madrid to question Emilio Ybarra and Pedro Luis Uriarte, the bank’s former chairman and chief executive respectively, who resigned in December 2001 amid a scandal over secret offshore accounts.

The US probe centers on BBVA’s activities in Puerto Rico, where it has an offshore subsidiary.

A copy of the letter, obtained by the Financial Times, says former BBVA employees in Puerto Rico interviewed by US prosecutors alleged that “BBVA did not comply with US banking laws, did not place any importance on compliance, maintained customer accounts in false names to conceal their true identities”.

The probe was triggered by the testimony of Nelson Rodriguez, a former BBVA employee in Puerto Rico, who is serving a jail sentence for embezzlement.

This investigation resulted in a Spanish fine levied against the newly formed BBVA of 40 million pesos and the resignation of Emilio Ybarra as co-chairman.  This left total control of the bank in the hands of Franciso Rodriguez Gonzalez. Rodriguez escaped prosecution in the matter by proclaiming that the laundering allegation occurred prior to his association with Ybarra. It’s unclear how Rodriguez could co-chair the BBV without knowing about the laundering.

Although it was Ybarra who it seems  took the major fall in this particular investigation, the Spanish bank BBV has been the subject of Spanish investigations going back to 1970.

According to a BBVA spoksman, “There were funds in the Cayman Islands, Jersey, Liechtenstein and Switzerland, but they were not, as some people think, all in accounts. They were a mixture of accounts, corporations, foundations…all sorts of stuff. The total came to €225m or £139m. The funds were used for trading shares, derivatives and other things on the market. “After our merger in 2000 we closed the accounts, brought the money back to Spain and paid the tax. We actually informed the Bank of Spain ourselves; nobody knew about it beforehand. We didn’t want to make it public, but there it is. “The papers are saying that the accounts were used to influence politicians, pay Basque terrorists and provide sweeteners for business deals but that isn’t on the charge sheets.

 In fact, we deny any illegal use of money.” The reference to the payment of Basque terrorists harks back to the time in the 1970s when ETA, the separatist group, kidnapped a relative of Ybarra’s, and a ransom demanded of the bank. The bank did not pay up and the hostage was killed. Ybarra has been accused of being soft on terrorists ever since, although the spokesman denied that BBV had ever paid any protection money to shield its executives from kidnapping with embezzled money that was washed through the offshore accounts, trusts and institutions.

The relevant mergers in the story began in 1987, the year the offshore entities came into being. Banco de Vizcaya was in the process of merging with Banco de Bilbao, a task it completed in 1988. The resulting entity, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya or BBV, then merged with Argentaria in 2000 to form BBVA

In 2002, Patrick Haynes the IRS special agent in charge of the New York field office and John Gilbride the special agent in charge of the New York DEA announced the unsealing of an indictment charging Alfonso Portillo, the former President of Guatemala with conspiring to launder millions of dollars he embezzeled from the Government of Guatemala through bank accounts located in the United States.

Starting in  2000 until 2002 Portillo embezzled about 2.5 million dollars provided by the government of Taiwan’s Embassy in Guatemala. Portillo endorsed these checks and caused them to be deposited  in a bank account in Miami Florida.

One million of the money was diverted through a series of transactions and transfers intended to conceal the source and origin of the funds to bank accounts in the name of Portillo’s ex wife and daughter at the BBVA bank in Paris. BBVA assisted Portillo by further laundering the money through financial institutions in Luxembourg and Switzerland among other places.

In 2001 Portillo embezzeled approximately 30 million Quetzales (3.9 million USD) from the Guatemalan Ministry of Defense. These funds ultimately ended up in a BBVA account controlled by Portillo’s wife.

Francisco Gonzalez-Rodriguez

Franciso Rodriguez Gonzalez has maintained his innocence in these illegal transactions stating: “I felt shocked, worried, and betrayed”  BBVA represents one of the biggest scandals to hit Europe’s banking sector in years.  The discovery of hidden BBVA bank accounts set off a chain of events that is still rocking Spain.

In July of 2002 the US Justice Department asked Spain’s Supreme Court Judge Baltazar Garzon to provide information on allegations of money laundering involving BBVA’s Puerto Rican unit. The allegation was that BBVA Puerto Rico helped Colombian drug smuggler Marco Aurelia Royo Anaya launder money, using accounts in tax-havens such as the Cayman Islands, through the unit itself and its private banking arm.

In January of 2005 BBVA was part of a criminal probe involving Venezuela’s Chavez. The allegation was that in 1998 and 1999 BBVA made two payments to aspiring president Chavez in the amount of $525,586 and $1,000,000.00 which was a violation of Venezuela’s law prohibiting the acceptance of contributions from foreign companies.

In spite of the previous laundering allegations against BBVA, in January of 2005 BBVA Group was authorized to acquire the Laredo National Bank based in Laredo Texas and in 2006 it acquired the Texas Regional Bancshares of McAllen Texas as well as the State National Bancshares to become the fourth biggest bank in Texas after Wells Fargo, Bank of America and JP Morgan Chase.

In December of 2009 the trustees in the Bernie Madoff case went after 7 global banks to recover more than 1 billion dollars.

Irving Picard, the trustee for the liquidation of Bernard Madoff Investment Securities filed complaints against Citigroup’s Citibank, Natixis, Fortis, ABN AMRO Bank, BBVA, Nomura and Merrill Lynch now owned by Bank of America.

The complaints allege that the banks enabled the Madoff Ponzi scheme by opening a spigot of new money into the Madoff feeder fund network by creating and offering derivative investment products linked to various Madoff feeder funds. Specifically 45 million dollars is sought to be recovered from BBVA.

In October of 2010 the Argentinean Financial Intelligence Unit sanctioned BBVA Banco Frances for breaching the anit-money laundering regulations by failing to report a transfer  in a fraudulent scheme.  All this under the watch of Francisco Rodriguez Gonzalez.

This operation was conducted by Jorge Pallavicino and involved an investigation that cost the Ministry of Finance to pay a non-existent debt valued at $53,963,112,072.50 pecos.

The Financial Intelligence Unit said in its decision to fine BBVA 40 million pesos that BBVA “never reported the deposit of 39,393.072.12 pesos into a Savings Account that was quickly transferred to the Banco De Valores SA.”

Purchases of financial institutions in the United States by foreign banks or holding companies are required to  be approved and sanctioned by the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve code of regulations specifically Title 12 includes the “Approval of offices of foreign banks: procedures for applications, standards for approval representative office activities and standards for approval and the preservation of existing authority.

This title says in part:

“Ensures that the foreign bank has adequate procedures for monitoring and controlling its activities worldwide”

“Obtains information on the dealings and relationship between the foreign bank and its affiliates, both foreign and domestic”

“In deciding whether to use its discretion under this paragraph (c)(1)(iii), the Board also shall consider whether the foreign bank has adopted and implemented procedures to combat money laundering.”

“Measures for prevention of money laundering. Whether the foreign bank has adopted and implemented procedures to combat money laundering, whether thre is legal regime in place in the home country to address money laundering and whether the home country is participating in multilateral efforts to combat money laundering.”

“Some of these supervisory responsibilities are delegated to the Reserve Banks by the Board of Governors. These responsibilities include the conduct of field examinations and inspections of state-chartered member banks, bank holding companies, and foreign bank offices in this country and the authority to approve certain types of bank and bank holding company applications.”

It appears that the Federal Reserve should not have allowed BBVA to do business in this country.

The Federal Reserve is made up of a board of governors with Ben S. Bernanke, serving as Chairman. The board supervises 12 Federal Reserve Bank districts.

BBVA’s main US office is located in Birmingham Alabama which is in the 6th Federal Reserve District.

Codefore researched the District Federal Reserve Bank Presidents to find which ones, if any, had direct connections or an employment history with the banking industry. All but one did not have any obvious connections with the private banking industry.

Dennis P Lockhart is the President of the 6th Federal Reserve Bank district.  Lockhart was appointed in March 2007 by then President Bush.

According to Lockhart’s bio he held various positions, both domestic and international, with Citicorp/Citibank (now Citigroup) from 1971 to 1988. Early in his career with Citibank, he worked in the Middle East, first in Saudi Arabia as head of infrastructure project financing and then in Greece as training director for credit and managerial staff serving the region.

Mr. Lockhart also served in Iran as chief operating officer of a commercial and consumer banking joint venture between Citibank and an Iranian affiliate. From 1978 to 1986, he was senior corporate officer of the Southeast office of Citibank in Atlanta. From 1987 to 1988, Mr. Lockhart was head of the firm’s Latin American debt-to-equity swap investment program, designed to restructure sovereign debt.  Its plausible that Lockhart met Rodriguez while serving in Latin America where BBV had a significant presence.

From 1988 to 2001, he worked at Heller Financial, where he served as executive vice president and director of the parent company and as president of Heller International Group, which, through joint ventures or wholly owned operating companies, had activities in commercial banking, finance, and merchant banking in North and South America, Europe, and Asia.

From 2001 to 2003, Mr. Lockhart was managing partner at the private equity firm Zephyr Management L.P., based in New York with activity in Africa and Latin America.

How did a bank with a history of money laundering and questionable management become a significant banking player in the United States?

Before Franciso Gonzalez joined Argentania he was founder and chairman of FG Inversiones Bursátiles, a leading securities firm in Spain, eventually acquired by Merrill Lynch. He started his own company after having qualified as a licensed broker (first of 1981 class) and got a Seat at the Madrid Stock Exchange.

As of July 2006, he is the Chairman of the European Financial Services Round Table (EFR). He is also member of the Institute international d’ études bancaires, the Board of Directors of The Institute of International Finance (IIF), the Capital Markets Consultative Group of the IMF (CMCG), the Board of Directors of the International Monetary Conference (IMC), the Global Advisory Council of the Conference Board and the International Advisory Committee of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, among other international fora.

As of July 2006, he is the Chairman of the European Financial Services Round Table (EFR). He is also member of the Institute international d’ études bancaires, the Board of Directors of The Institute of International Finance (IIF), the Capital Markets Consultative Group of the IMF (CMCG), the Board of Directors of the International Monetary Conference (IMC), the Global Advisory Council of the Conference Board and the International Advisory Committee of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, among other international fora.

In 2006 BBVA outbid Banco Santander Central Hispano, and Bank of America by forming an alliance with China CITIC Bank, one of the largest banks in China by acquiring a stake in the bank and in CITIC International Financial Holdings Limited, China Citic Groups’s main international Arm.

In January of 2011 Prnewswire announced that BBVA and Wells Fargo Bank  join the Ex-IM Bank Medium-Term Delegated Authority Program. The two banks can now expand support and reduce transaction turnaround time for U.S. smallbusiness exporters. These two banks have been approved by the Export-Import Bank of the United States to be eligible lenders under it’s Medium-Term Delegated Authority Program.

In February 2007 BBVA announced a definitive agreement to acquire Compass Bancshares In. based in Birmingham Alabama. The deal was consummated in September 2007.

In August 2009 BBVA Compass acquired the deposits of failed Guaranty Bank of Austin Texas.  The deal gives BBVA Compass a first time presence in California.

All of the above business acquisitions have been approved by the Federal Reserve.

On September 13, 2010 BBVA became an official sponsor of the NBA.

BBVA Compass is quickly becoming a dynamic global banking force.  BBVA’s business practices have caused outrage.

It appears that BBVA as well as City Bank and Wells Fargo have not stopped laundering money and using loop holes in Federal Banking laws to extract money from customer’s accounts and in some cases even defrauding the Government.

In February 2012 The Associated Press reported that Citigroup was ordered to pay 158 Million in a Mortgage Fraud Settlement. The government said that Citi Mortgage had certified 30,000 mortgages for insurance provided by the FHA and submitted many certifications that were “knowingly or recklessly false”

On February 2012 a Federal Lawsuit was filed seeking the recovery of unpaid overtime for Mortgage Banking Officers that worked for BBVA Compass Bank.

BBVA Compass clients who have checking and savings accounts are routinely reporting money missing from their accounts as the result of excessive and unfair overdraft charges by withholding customer deposits, charging interest and overdraft fees on overdraft fees not paid and  creating a banking customer fee ponzi scheme.

shirley of Azle, TX on Feb. 27, 2012

“In 2000, I purchased CDs for my grandchildren (ages 4 to 14). All but 2 had been surrendered. In 2009, the bank notified one child (not me, the holder/custodian) of inactivity on his CD. This prompted me to go into the bank, and check on the CDs. I was told the CDs were active.

I went in again in April 2010, and checked. Again, I was assured they were fine. In August 2011, both kids were notified by the Texas State comptroller, that the CDs had been turned over to the state. As the holder/custodian (plainly stated on the CDs), I was never contacted. The bank has sent me checks for the state’s fee, and the lost interest from the time they were turned over to the state until October. At that time, I requested the status of my remaining CD, and was told it had been cashed in. I argued that was not so, but they insisted. When I went into the bank and closed my account on October 24, 2011, the man helping me asked if I wanted to keep my remaining CD. I was shocked.

Of course I cashed it in. I guess they would have sent that $6300. to the state.

Since my 2 grandchildren are not 18 yet, they cannot get their money from the state, but with lots of leg work and tons of paperwork, I was allowed to apply for the funds.

The state has had the claims for 22 weeks today. I just called to inquire how things were progressing, and was told they had not started on October’s claims. They are still working on August’s claims. Thanks, Compass Bank! Sara will graduate in May. The incompetence of your employees is inexcusable.”

There is now an effort to obtain enough petition signatures to force an investigation into how BBVA compass was able to obtain approval to do business in the United States and who  actally authorized it.

Protect your children

Sign Petition

Codefore Publishing announces the signing of two new authors

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Codefore Publishing signs two new authors.

NORTH AMERICAN PACIFIC COASTAL WATERS February 22nd 2012.   Codefore Publishing , known for publishing true crime books, has announced that two new authors have been signed. Jim Benish  of  Codefore Publishing said that the genre of published books will no longer be restricted to True Crime.

Benish said that the works submitted for publishing will always be scrutinized however any genre will be considered.  “Its my belief that any work that is interesting and holds your attention should be offered up to the public”  Benish said. “Its very difficult for authors to weed through all of the power house publishing companies and agents only to be declined.  Work should not be declined just because the author is not well known, or the subject matter isn’t within certain guidelines or there is a belief that the book will not sell. “

“We publishers can be our own worst enemies.   We jump up and down and scream at the thought of someone telling us that we must or must not publish and print anything that we want to yet we indirectly take away a talented author’s freedom of speech by refusing to publish their work because it’s not in our business plan or it is too controversial.”  “And if a first time author is lucky enough to find a publisher who will take on the work, the publisher and distributor  keep most of the profit.”

“We at Codefore have decided to open the door to publishing anyone’s work who writes in good faith.  Someone once said that if Shakespeare’s work had to pass the litmus test that authors today must pass to get published Shakespeare’s  work wouldn’t be on the shelf.”

Codefore Publishing is a small publisher that began in 2009 in Phoenix Arizona.  Codefore Publishing is an internet driven company. They charge no upfront fees and offer lucrative royalties and the books are available on line or in any book store world wide. Codefore does not assume the roll of promoter for the author.

“Education of a Street Cop” by JJ Henson.

John Henson spent many years as a street cop and didn’t lose his sense of humor during the process.   When watching today’s television shows about police work did you ever wonder how much of what you see is real and how much is not?  Education of a Street Cop is about how John’s TV motivated expectations of police work ended when he set foot inside of a patrol car for the first time. His ideology was changed, molded and finally crushed over the next few years.  This book is a comical satiracle look at a cops life on the street. Its intertaining and fast reading.  With a wink, John says the characters are fictional.

 

 

 

 

 

“Lily and the Golden Lute” by Amanda Steinhoff

Lilly and the Golden Lute

 

Amanda Steinhoff hists a home run with this story about young female pirates.  This story has an imaginative flare sprinkled with innocent romance.  Pirates of the high seas in the 1600’s  were competing with Lili and her crew for the booty and adventure available to them everywhere they sailed. Lili could be described as a young woman’s “Harry Potter.”

Don’t be surprised to see a sequel!!

Bachmann and Paul refuse to vote on HR3630

At lunch time in Washington on 12/20/2011 a vote was held for HR 3630.  This is not the proposed bill passed by the Senate that extends unemployment benefits and employment tax relief.

HR 3630 was put up by the Republicans to see if they could talk about the bill passed by the Republicans.  Passage of HR 3630 in effect stalls the Senate bill.

Since the Republicans have the majority, the bill passed. I’ll call it the “lets talk about it bill” and it in effect means there will not be an actual vote on the bill passed by the Senate by a bipartisan majority.  The senate bill was a critical bill that should have become effective before the end of this year to preserve unemployment benefits and a tax break for everyone.

The Republican party who stands for less taxes for business has passed HR 3630 that means more taxes and less benefits for the working and laid off Americans.

This vote comes as a surprise to everyone. Democrats all voted to the man against HR 3630. Seven Republicans broke ranks and voted against it too.

Two Republican presidential candidates, Bachmann and Paul, did not vote.  Paul’s son said, “I don’t think we should pay people not to work” (paraphrased)

Bachmann has said, “Our nation needs to stop doing for people what they can and should do for themselves. Self reliance means, if anyone will not work, neither should he eat.”


FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 946

H R 3630      YEA-AND-NAY      20-Dec-2011      12:56 PM
QUESTION:  On Motion to Go to Conference
BILL TITLE: To provide incentives for the creation of jobs, and for other purposes

A yea vote means a vote to send it back to the Senate for conference

A nay vote means a vote must be taken on the bill passed by the Senate

Republican  Yeas 229   Nays 7

Democrat    Nays 186

TOTALS        Yeas 229

                       Nays 193

How Police Catch molesters

A Christmas tribute to our Child Soldiers

 

Last year I penned this tribute to our military sons and daughters. They began their service as children and returned never to be the same. I have never re posted a blog before but this is appropriate for those returning from Iraq.

A 2010 Memorial Day Tribute To our Children and a Caution

admin on June 1, 201016 Comments [edit]

Editorial             

As a veteran who served from 1966 to 1968,  I wonder what my fallen comrades would think of our country, our political leaders, and the general direction our country is taking today.

It brings a tear.  I see the same indifference to the lives of those who serve today as the souls who served back in the 60′s.   Back then (Back in the day) I was proud to step forward. I believed in what our political leaders told us.  So did my brother Rick.  And  my parents?  I think so. It was a proud nation. A proud generation. As it turned out, a generation of change.

I thought I was going to serve and protect our country from future aggression. “Protect the world from Communism” I was told.  I didn’t understand the reality of it all until many years later. Its interesting. I didn’t think much of all the protests against the war or the draft dodgers or politicians who put their careers on the line to protest but as I look back I am compelled to wonder who the realist was, me or the war protesters?

Who protested this war, was it our senators, our congressmen, or our President?

In 1966 it was my classmates, the future generation.  Who is protesting now?

The song  phrase “I aint no  Senator’s Son” by JC Fogerty applied to me  and  800,000 other sons.

It is still relevant today.

It’s different now you say. We (Those of us who do not hold a political title) have smartened up  haven’t we. Our children, our babies, are once again coming home in boxes draped with flags or alive  physically and mentally maimed.  Our government is still making loop-hole filled empty promises  to take care of them as they did during Viet Nam .

Our survivors are getting pats  on their backs now as they did in 1968 and those who did not survive received  a piece of metal attached to  red white and blue  ribbons laid on their caskets followed by  empty promises to everyone  to end  the war.

Do not get me wrong. Our men and women  have served proudly. I stand as a guardian. No one should dare tarnish their brave service to me without suffering my wrath.

But as a father now,  I have walked in the shoes of my parents and my parent’s parents.  Did we fail our children? Have we allowed our leaders to send  our children into harms way the same way my parents did during the Viet Nam conflict (War) ?  And did we allow a child’s death for  political decisions like Viet Nam or Iraq or Afghanistan or…….., countries  that have the significance of a flea on a dog?   I think the answer is yes.

Are we becoming  accustomed to war? Are we sheep?  Are we  protesting  immigration laws but not a war that is taking our children and  our future heritage away from us?  What about  our  children? Have we  put them  on the line for sand and oil?  In 1966 parents had nothing to say about whether a person was inducted into the service. It was mandated by our government.

Today we cannot stop our children from entering the call to service on their own. But where is the protest? Where is it hiding?  Are we allowing the people  in government, who’s only loyalty is to big business, to put our children in jeopardy without accountability?

Let us bow our heads at the white stones standing at formation in our National Cemeteries and pay homage.  Let us read the names and honor them. Let us beg for forgiveness. Let us promise them to honor what they have sacrificed.  Let us stop future sacrifice without protest.

Most important, let us hold our leaders responsible for their decisions and their deeds.  It’s not too late for our future generations, our babies.  Our tendency to vote based on  a political party affiliation  rather than on a candidates character should to change.

Those of you who vote purely based on party lines are  taking a huge gamble and your chips are our children, our land, our seas and our future.

JD Benish

How police detectives find child molesters

 

Beginning January 1st Codefore Zap is going to give away the book Protectus Prol. This book retails at $15.00.  With the sudden exposure of pedophiles in our colleges and universities we feel that it is imperative that we provide this information to anyone who either has children or knows of someone who has children and could benefit from the information provided in this book.

We are a small publishing company and do not have the funding to provide everyone with a hard copy of the book Protectus Prol so we have decided to provide an audio version. This is completely free of charge.  Every week beginning with the first week in January 2012 a chapter will be available to anyone who registers as a user on this site. You will have access to all of the chapters.

If you are looking for a Christmas gift that might save a child from molestation you can purchase the book on this site or www.codefore.com for $14.99. Shipping is free and the book is normally shipped within one day.

 

The parents of the children molested by this man didnt know that he was a molester. They didnt know what molesters do and say and they didnt recognize  the behavior changes in their children after the fact.  Very sad.

Below is Jerry Sandusky who was a coach at Penn State University. We will probably never know how many children he has molested. Jerry says he is innocent.  Its typical molester behavior and there is much more.

 

 

An open letter to Rand Paul cc: Ron Paul

Mr. Paul,

I am not a Republican or Democrat but I am a fairly  successful author and blogger. I was leaning toward voting for your father until I heard you respond to the question from a journalist on national television. The question was  “Would you vote to extend unemployment benefits?”  Your response (paraphrased) was “I cannot vote to pay people not to work”

 

Mr Paul your response demonstrates to me that you are  far removed from what is going on in this country and I  can only assume that your father is removed too. I use the word removed loosely to be kind to you. Your response also tells me that you will vote to appease big business (Who cannot vote) and turn your arrogant back to your constituency who can and does vote.

I can promise you this Mr. Paul. I will not forget your attitude when you come up for re- election. I will remind the voters in your state about the degree of compassion you have for the lowly voters who choose to receive unemployment benefits when they could work if they wanted to.

However I  suggest this. Most politicians who think that people on welfare, unemployment, etc: today are in their predicament because they choose to be, are forgetting who the real welfare recipients are.   They are themselves, the politicians who are elected to do a job, but instead collect money from special interest groups and disregard the promises they made to get elected.

They receive welfare because they are  are certainly not doing what they are being paid to do.  They are not representing their constituents or putting their county first.  Are they Mr. Paul?

I sent a similar email to Mr. Jim Bunning  prior to his political demise. I was a man of my word. Good luck on your re-election Mr. Paul.

Jim Benish

 

How pedophiles stalk children

Newt Gingrich’s money, crack cocaine and the Nicaraguan Contras

Lately my writings have been political in nature.  Its because my finances have been affected by our economic conditions as well as everyone else’s.  It appears that the populace in this country is beginning to mirror the civil unrest in other countries.  Citizens here are frustrated and don’t know how to dig themselves out of this quandary.  This frustration is most visible and understandable in the demonstrations organized and executed by the “Occupy” movement.  This movement is comprised of a wide range of citizens in this country and I’m certainly impressed with the large numbers of people who have never participated in political movements before.  This is a powerful message.

You can agree or disagree with their ideals if you can determine exactly what they are but their activities are the result of an across the board revolt by the citizens of this country.  The problem is that the cause of our economic condition has not surfaced. This just fuels the frustrations.  As I have written before, we the voters of this country hold the most responsibility for our woes.  And at the end of the day we the voters are the only way out of this mess.

Its should be clear to all that political corruption and graft is rampant in our political system.  The Republicans blame the Democrats and the Democrats blame the Republicans.  But we know they are both to blame and are both in bed with anyone who gives them money.

The Occupy movement is the first movement I have seen that makes no distinction of political party responsibility for this graft but holds the banking and financial system responsible.  There is no doubt that the rich and affluent including the banks are having their way with the political rats in office and  we should get rid of the rats who willingly perform their tricks when fed by the rich.

In doing this would not the banks lose their influence?  Of course they would.  The Occupy people should be occupying the front lawns of each and every politician who is on the take not the banks. If its not known who is on the take get rid of them if they are an incumbent in 2012. No matter what party they are affiliated with.

I can give you an idea which presidential candidate is and is not taking money from our financial institutions if you vist the blog page on Political corruption.

I did a page earlier on my view that the Republican party was running out of time coming up with a valid solid presidential candidate.  It was never more apparent than when first HermanCain and then Newt Gingrich rose to the top of the heap.  Even Republicans cannot see a way out with this field of candidates.

Democrats don’t really have a choice.  As far as we know President Obama will be the republican’s foe. My fear is and it’s a probability, that Obama will win in 2012 and unless the voters make across the board changes in the Senate and Congress and vote for people who have the good of our country as their mandate we will be doomed.

The worst case scenario of all would be to elect one of the rats taking money and no changes in the status quo in Congress and the Senate.

I have written about most of the Republican candidates and extensively some of the appointments and decisions that are coming out of the current white house.  However I  have not mentioned Newt Gingrich because I never dreamed he would be a serious consideration for president.

Newt Gingrich

Gingrich would have us believe that he is somehow a Washington outsider and would be a better choice than the others. I did some checking on him and I think he is just another  that thinks he has  hidden his nest.  You decide for yourself.

Gingrich has been taking money from big business for decades.  During the past five years, Gingrich has raised about $52 million for his tax-exempt political committies including $28.2 million during 2009 and 2010.  Gingrich is not required to list these funds in his presidential campaign financial reports because he didn’t receive the funds his Tax-exempt committies have received the funds.  He did however report the following direct campaign contributions. The list has a story to tell

Newt Gingrich’s latest revelation is that he proposes to eliminate Social Security and privatize it. Are we going to trust our money with a plan that is authored by Newt Gingrich? Who will invest it and where?

Of particular note is the fact that Gingrich has received money from a person named Rex Sinquefield  who is at the bottom of the below list.  Rex and Newt know how to collect and disperse funds by stepping around the law.

Campaign donation controversy

Sinquefield

Mr. Sinquefield is a major financial contributor to political campaigns in Missouri politics. He has particularly focused on supporting public school vouchers and opposing campaign contribution limits. Despite his philanthropic focus, he has been criticized for creating 100 Political action committees through which to funnel his donations, thereby bypassing legal limits on individual donations to political campaigns. The Missouri Citizen Education Fund has contended that he has essentially ‘bought’ votes on issues such as campaign contribution limits and private school vouchers.

On October 12, 2010, Mr. Sinquefield donated $25,000 to Rep. Timothy Jones, who was running unopposed in Missouri’s 89th district.

Fred Sacher  Gingrich,  Contras and Triad Management

Another interesting Gingrich campaign contributor is Fred Sacher.  Mr Sacher lists his status as retired but he owns a California General Contracting Company.  Sacher and Gingrich go back a long way.  Back to when Gingrich was speaker of the house.  Back to the time Gingrich’s tax exempt political action entity “Contract with America” was receiving money. Back when Gingrich was financially supporting the Nicaraguan contras who were later linked to the transportation of large amounts of cocaine into California.. One of Gingrich’s donators is Triad Management Services Inc.

Mexico/California war on drugs

Triad Management, Inc., is a for-profit corporation owned by Republican fundraiser Carolyn Malenick. Malenick incorporated Triad in the spring of 1996 but appears to have operated the business as an unincorporated entity since at least early 1995.

Triad Management, Inc

105th Congress
; 2nd Session

 

Senate Report 105-167 Part 5

 

105 S. Rpt. 167; Prt. 5

 

INVESTIGATION OF ILLEGAL OR IMPROPER ACTIVITIES IN CONNECTION WITH 1996 FEDEELECTION CAMPAIGNS

Carolyn Malenick

Triad holds itself out as a consulting business that provides advice to conservative donors about how to maximize their political contributions. Triad (Carolyn Malenik) oversaw advertising in 26 campaigns for the House of Representatives and three Senate races. Triad’s spending may have affected the outcome of some elections. Because Triad is an unusual corporation directly involved in federal campaigns, the Committee investigated its work. Despite the refusal by Triad and its lawyers to comply fully with subpoenas for both documents and testimony, the Minority developed substantial evidence of wrongdoing by Triad.

 

Nicaraguan contras

Triad Management Inc and its affiliates counted many other conservative activists among their large donors. Bank records showed California developer Fred R. Sacher contributed $200,000 to Citizens for Reform and Citizens for the Republic Education Fund in 1996.

Sacher was a major supporter of the Nicaraguan contras during the 1980s, donated nearly $200,000 to GOPAC, a political action committee formerly run by House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), and in 1995 funded a media campaign to help promote Gingrich’s Contract With America. Sacher could not be reached at his Grass Valley, Calif. home.

An August, 1996, series in the San Jose Mercury News by reporter Gary Webb linked the origins of crack cocaine in California to the contras, a guerrilla force backed by the Reagan administration that attacked Nicaragua’s Sandinista government during the 1980s. Webb’s series, “The Dark Alliance,” has been the subject of intense media debate, and has focused attention on a foreign policy drug scandal that leaves many questions unanswered.

 Terry Kohler.

Conservative financier invests in Republicans

by Bob Vitale

Terry Kohler

Just before Newt Gingrich became speaker of the House, he made a pilgrimage to Sheboygan, Wis. Why? Because Terry Kohler asked him.

“Terry and Mary Kohler are such old friends and have been so vital to what we’ve been doing that when they called, I couldn’t turn them down,” Gingrich remarked after delivering a December dinner speech to the Sheboygan Economic Club. “They’ve done so much over the years to make it possible for us to win this majority.”

If Gingrich is fighting a Republican revolution, Terry Kohler — son and grandson of Wisconsin governors and heir to one of the state’s biggest financial empires — is supplying the ammunition. A former Air Force pilot who now flies his own planes, a former politician who now finances others, the 60-year-old Kohler is the biggest individual contributor to Gingrich and his conservative causes.

From 1988 to 1994, according to the Wall Street Journal, the Kohlers gave $714,457 to GOPAC, a political action committee founded by Gingrich. Since the party took control of Congress in January, Kohler has chipped in another $70,000 — more than anyone else in the country. The Kohlers also have given an undisclosed amount to the Progress and Freedom Foundation, a conservative think tank founded by Gingrich, and $9,000 to the Georgian’s campaign committee during the last three elections.

Many have speculated why. Is the president of Windway Capital Corp. — a holding company that owns North Sails Inc., Vollrath Co. and others — looking for a business advantage or a tax break? Those who know Kohler say his motivation is much closer to the surface. “Terry doesn’t think in those terms,” says one Wisconsin reporter who has covered him for years. “He wants to influence the thinking of this country.”

Kohler found an ally in the combative congressman he first met in 1984. Gingrich not only was a fellow Republican who dared to dream of a GOP-controlled Congress, but also had a plan to achieve it. “Our country and our Constitution are worth saving,” Kohler said before the 1994 election. “The only way that it is not going to crash is if the Republicans take control of the House and Senate.”

Gingrich doesn’t have to rely on campaign contributions. He collects money on the side via his political action organizations and he has stepped around the law again by receiving money from the banking industry claiming that it is for consulting services.

The Huffington Post

In recent months, GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich has strongly criticized Freddie Mac and sister company Fannie Mae, as well as Democrats in Congress that he claims played a key role in the collapse of the housing market. And yet two former Freddie Mac officials recently told Bloomberg that Gingrich made between $1.6 million and $1.8 million in consulting fees from the mortgage company.

That amount is significantly larger than the $300,000 payment that Gingrich was asked about during a Republican presidential debate on Nov. 9.

The Freddie Mac officials also told Bloomberg that Gingrich was asked to build bridges with Capitol Hill Republicans and help sell the mortgage company’s public-private structure to conservatives.

Gingrich recently said that he hasn’t been a lobbyist since leaving his post in Washington.

Gingrich’s 2011 campaign contributors

Peabody Energy 550,000

Crow Holdings  350,000

Devon Energy  250,000

Plains Exploration & Production  200,000

Workforce Fairness Institute 150,000

American Electric Power 100,000

Arch Coal  50,000

Capital Corp.  50,000

Galliano Marine Services  50,000

Lexington Management Group 50,000

Rowley Co.  50,000

Sheldon Adelson  Las Vegas Sands  1,000,000

Michael Morris  American Electric Power 300,000

James France  Nascar 211,200 (Founded Nascar Circuit and is one of the richest people in the world worth 1.5  billion dollars) Forbes

Stanley Hubbard  Hubbard Broadcasting 175,000   1.9 Billion

Charles Schwab  Charles Schwab & C  150,000 Schwab retirement Plan Services Inc. 4.7billion

Terry Kohler  Windway Capitol Corp. 150,000

Fred Sacher  Real Estate Investor/General Contractor  135,000

Daniel Heard  125,000 (Beer Distributor)

Rex Sinquefield  100,000 Billionaire

 

Keep your children safe from Jerry Sandusky