In hind sight the Federation of American Scientists say Japan blew it.

Charles D Ferguson, President of the Federation of American Scientists says :

 Japan generates about 30 percent of its electricity from 54 commercial reactors. Tokyo plans to ramp up significantly its use of nuclear power to about 41 percent by 2017 and 50 percent by 2050.

 But these risks become too reliant on this source for electricity generation. In an earthquake-prone region, one massive quake can knock out numerous reactors for many months, resulting in significant economic harm and adverse effects on people’s livelihoods.  I argue for effective policies to stimulate greater growth in renewable sources such as solar thermal, solar photovoltaic, wind, and geothermal, which are all abundant in Japan.

The implications for other countries in earthquake risky regions are clear. In particular, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam that have expressed renewed interest in acquiring their first nuclear power plants need to weigh this investment versus  investment in renewable energies.

 I am not arguing that  nuclear power should not be used. But it must meet rigorous standards of safety: both in human operations and ability to withstand natural disasters. Japan could serve as a leader in the Asia-Pacific region and for other regions that are earthquake prone such as California by  shifting its electricity generation more rapidly toward renewable energies.

On March 11, Marco Werman of PRI’s The World, interviewed Ferguson about nuclear power, accidents, and renewable energy policy in Japan. Listen to the five-minute interview.

Leave a Reply

Follow Me